The Strategic Advantage of Negatively Interdependent Preferences

نویسندگان

  • Levent Koçkesen
  • Efe A. Ok
  • Rajiv Sethi
چکیده

We study certain classes of supermodular and submodular games which are symmetric with respect to material payoffs but in which not all players seek to maximize their material payoffs. Specifically, a subset of players have negatively interdependent preferences and care not only about their own material payoffs but also about their payoffs relative to others. We identify sufficient conditions under which members of the latter group have a strategic advantage in the following sense: at all intragroup symmetric equilibria of the game, they earn strictly higher material payoffs than do players who seek to maximize their material payoffs. The conditions are satisfied by a number of games of economic importance. We discuss the implications of these findings for the evolutionary theory of preference formation and the theory of strategic delegation. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C72, D62. 2000 Academic Press doi:10.1006 jeth.1999.2587, available online at http: www.idealibrary.com on

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The strategic advantage of negatively interdependent preferences in action-monotonic games

Investigating the strategic advantage of negatively interdependent preferences in action monotonic games, we derive equivalent criteria both for general action monotonic games and for the subclass of action monotonic games with spillovers. Examples demonstrate the generality of our findings, in particular that the strategic advantage prevails beyond the classes of superand submodular games. The...

متن کامل

The strategic advantage of interdependent preferences in rent-seeking contests

We study rent-seeking contests, where the set of players contains two groups of players — one with independent preferences and the other with interdependent preferences. It turns out that the latter experience a strategic advantage in general two-player contests and in n-player-contests with nonincreasing marginal efficiency. As to the case of general n-player contests with increasing marginal ...

متن کامل

Interdependent preferences and strategic distinguishability

We study agents whose expected utility preferences are interdependent for informational or psychological reasons. We characterize when two types can be “strategically distinguished” in the sense that they are guaranteed to behave differently in some finite mechanism. We show that two types are strategically distinguishable if and only if they have different hierarchies of interdependent prefere...

متن کامل

Comparative Statics, Stability, and Uniqueness

Consider an economic model whose equilibrium can be represented as the …xed point of a system of di¤erentiable equations. Using the theory ofB matrices, I show that comparative statics are well-behaved if the interactions between the equations are not too large, and the negative interactions are not too varied. When there are only positive interactions, for example when strategic complements pr...

متن کامل

Negatively interdependent preferences

We develop a theory of representation of interdependent preferences that re ̄ect the widely acknowledged phenomenon of keeping up with the Joneses (i.e. of those preferences which maintain that well-being depend on ``relative standing'' in the society as well as on material consumption). The principal ingredient of our analysis is the assumption that individuals desire to occupy a (subjectively)...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • J. Economic Theory

دوره 92  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000